From: Scott Douglas, raiderlover@adelphia.net Subject: Re: SD Union-Tribune AENT Review Date: 2/25/2002 7:05:35 PM To: "Christopher B. Prescott", cbprescott@earthlink.net Seance List, seance@lists.no-fi.com I think that because most critics don't really know the band and their music. Nor do they understand the band's sense of experimentation and branching out. They (critics) never try to do more than just skim the surface of their music. That's why I never bother to listen to critics. Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher B. Prescott" To: "Seance List" Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:39 PM Subject: RE: SD Union-Tribune AENT Review you know, just reading that brief review it ocurred to me that i think that 90% of the reviews of a recent church album (say, since MATS), even slightly on the positive side, all say something along the lines of "a return to form". does that bug anyone else? always returning to form but never have they been in form? prescott -----Original Message----- From: seance@lists.no-fi.com [mailto:seance@lists.no-fi.com]On Behalf Of purple pagoda Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:14 PM To: seance@lists.no-fi.com Subject: SD Union-Tribune AENT Review Brief Review of AENT from the 'San Diego Union-Tribune': http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/uniontrib/thu/night_day/news_mz1w21takes. html Bill Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here