From: spirit stiff, fenfenfen@hotmail.com
Subject: initially aent
Date: 2/7/2002 3:27:33 PM
To: seance@lists.no-fi.com


well.  a day after.  2 listens back to back last evening.  more to come this 
evening.  at first listen.  hmmm?   at second listen.  ahhhh.  and i imagine 
it will continue like that.  as far as my take on the mix.  to me (as i 
believe someone else mentioned), it is transparent, nothing like HOB.  for 
those of you who think this is muddy, may i suggest an ear cleaning?  no 
disrespect intended.  i think these songs are minimal compared to HOB as far 
as layers and mix is concerned.  though not sacrificing any beauty.  
packaging.  very interesting.  layout for the song listing is nice.  anyone 
catch the physical shift of the letters, from left to right, the way it's 
laid out?  also on the layout.  when one has the card open, the way the 
songs are listed...1-5 on left side and 6-10 on right side.   1 matching 6, 
2 matching 7, etc.  i think the album was sequenced that way...like mini 
singles laid out, side one and side two, vinyl style.  hope that makes 
sense, what im trying to convey.  at first listen didnt like after 
everything, second listen proved better.  and awful ache, i like the 3/4 
intro/break, and the rest of the body of the song, still digesting the 2 of 
them together though.  the rest were ringing immediately.  goodnight to all.
love and light.
fen.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com